出去玩都係孩子嘅權利：研究整理有特殊需要孩子喺戶外玩同「帶少少挑戰嘅玩」遇到嘅關卡 Play Outside Is Every Child's Right: What Research Says About the Hurdles Children with Disabilities Meet in Outdoor and Adventurous Play

作者 Byline：周Sir／chausir.com

本文由 AI 協助整理公開資料。 This article summarises public research with AI assistance.

1. 呢份研究做咗啲咩 ｜ What the study looked at

中文

加拿大團隊 Locke、Stone、So、Sheriko、Arbour-Nicitopoulos、Brussoni 同 Moore，2026 年 4 月喺《BMC Public Health》發表一篇範疇回顧同敘事合成，整理有殘疾／特殊需要兒童青少年（約 0 至 24 歲）喺戶外玩，以及「帶少少挑戰嘅玩」（英文叫 risky play）方面嘅經驗文獻。團隊同圖書館員一齊設計搜尋策略，喺六個資料庫搜尋，由多位研究員篩選，再用社會生態模型（由個人、家庭、社區到政策幾個層面）整理結果；計劃已喺 OSF 登記。[1]

English

A Canadian team (Locke, Stone, So, Sheriko, Arbour-Nicitopoulos, Brussoni and Moore) published a scoping review and narrative synthesis in April 2026 in BMC Public Health. It gathers research on how children and young people with disabilities (about 0 to 24 years old) experience outdoor play and "risky play", which here means play with a little challenge and room to explore. The search strategy was built with a librarian, six databases were searched, several reviewers screened the records, and the findings were organised with the socioecological model, which looks at the individual, family, community and policy levels. The review was registered with OSF. [1]

2. 研究見到啲咩 ｜ What the review found

中文

研究發現，最終納入 69 篇文章，研究設計、地區同殘疾類型都好多樣。多數文章講戶外玩，講「帶挑戰嘅玩」嘅相對少。文獻描述咗呢類玩法嘅定義、類型、孩子嘅偏好同好處，亦喺社會生態模型每一個層面都列出咗障礙同促進因素，即係由孩子自己、屋企、社區、場地以至政策，都有可能卡住或者幫到參與。

背景部分指出，戶外玩同帶挑戰嘅玩，同孩子身體、思考、社交同情緒健康有關聯；所有孩子都有玩嘅權利，但有殘疾嘅孩子參與得唔夠多。作者綜合指出，孩子同支持佢哋嘅大人往往要好有韌力，克服好多關卡先可以參與；未來需要多啲政策層面嘅安排，並且讓孩子同支持者有更大自主權決定點樣參與，先至有「有質素嘅參與」。以上係對現有文獻嘅整理，唔代表某一種場地或玩法一定帶來某一結果。[1]

English

The review included 69 articles, which varied widely in study design, location and type of disability. Many articles looked at outdoor play, while only a few looked at risky play. The articles described definitions, types, children's preferences and the benefits of these kinds of play. They also reported barriers and facilitators at every level of the socioecological model, so the child, the family, the community, the play space and policy can each hold participation back or help it along.

The background notes that outdoor and risky play are associated with physical, cognitive, social and emotional health and wellbeing, that all children have the right to play, and that children with disabilities are not taking part enough. The authors conclude that these children and the adults who support them show real resilience in getting past many barriers in order to play. They call for more work at the policy level, and for children and their supporters to have more autonomy in deciding how they take part, so that participation can be of good quality. This is a summary of existing literature. It does not show that any one play space or type of play always leads to any one result. [1]

3. 讀研究時要留意 ｜ Reading the findings with care

中文

呢篇係範疇回顧，目的係睇吓現有文獻講咗啲咩，唔係比較邊種做法成效，亦唔係講因果。「帶少少挑戰嘅玩」唔係鼓勵危險玩命，而係喺大人守住安全底線之下，俾孩子試吓自己探索。納入研究大多來自外國，香港嘅居住密度、公園設計同社區文化未必一樣，只可以作參考。[1]

English

This is a scoping review. Its aim is to map what the existing literature covers. It does not compare which approach works better, and it is not about cause and effect. "Risky play" does not mean encouraging danger. It means giving children some room to explore on their own while adults hold a safe baseline. Most included studies come from outside Hong Kong, where housing density, park design and community culture may differ, so the findings are a reference only. [1]

4. 香港家長可以點留意 ｜ Small things Hong Kong parents can notice

中文

香港公共空間細，遊樂場同屋邨設施未必個個孩子都用得順，有特殊需要孩子嘅家長有時會覺得「帶出去好麻煩，留喺屋企穩陣啲」。呢篇回顧提醒：玩唔係多餘嘅嘢，而係孩子權利嘅一部分；好多關卡唔係因為家長唔夠用心，而係場地、資訊、社區態度同政策配套未齊。

日常可以試吓：揀一個地面平啲、有蔭、有位坐低休息嘅公園，先去短短時間；出門前同孩子一齊揀「今日想試邊樣」，例如盪鞦韆、玩沙或者行斜路，大人守住安全底線，但留少少空間俾孩子自己試；約同樣處境嘅家庭一齊去，互相照應；如果見到場地唔方便，可以向屋邨管理處、區內康樂服務或者學校反映共融遊樂嘅需要。

喺 CRP（Communication, Relationship, Parenting）嘅角度，一齊出去玩本身就係溝通同關係：孩子揀、大人陪，慢慢建立「我可以試」嘅信心。研究只係參考，每個家庭節奏唔同，唔使逼自己或者逼孩子一次過做到。

English

Public space in Hong Kong is tight, and playgrounds and estate facilities do not always work well for every child. Parents of children with special needs sometimes feel that "going out is such a hassle, staying home is safer". This review is a reminder that play is not an extra. It is part of every child's rights, and many of the hurdles come from play spaces, information, community attitudes and policy support rather than from parents not trying hard enough.

In everyday life, you could pick a park with flatter ground, some shade and places to sit, and start with a short visit. Before heading out, choose together with your child what to try today, such as the swings, the sandpit or walking up a gentle slope. Adults hold the safe baseline, while leaving a little room for the child to try things on their own. Going with another family in a similar situation means you can look out for each other. If a play space is hard to use, you can raise the need for inclusive play with your estate management office, the district leisure services or the school.

From a CRP (Communication, Relationship, Parenting) point of view, playing outside together is itself communication and relationship: the child chooses, the adult stays alongside, and confidence that "I can try" grows step by step. The research is a reference only. Every family has its own pace, and there is no need to push yourself or your child to do it all at once.

資料來源 ｜ Sources

1. Locke, M., Stone, M. R., So, S., Sheriko, J., Arbour-Nicitopoulos, K. P., Brussoni, M., & Moore, S. A. (2026). How does disability impact children's experiences in outdoor and risky play? A scoping review and narrative synthesis. BMC Public Health, 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-27201-x

免責聲明 ｜ Disclaimer

教育資訊，非診斷或醫療建議。 Educational information, not a diagnosis or medical advice.

周Sir 嘅講座同文章屬家長教育，不提供診斷、評估或治療，亦不提供醫療或用藥建議；如有需要，請諮詢合資格專業人士。

Chau Sir's talks and articles are parent education. They do not provide diagnosis, assessment or treatment, and do not provide medical or medication advice. If needed, please consult a qualified professional.